A Psalms Word Cloud

Word clouds are a clever way to show the relative importance of a collection of topics by representing the frequency of occurrence of a topic through the font size. The cloud below was made using wordle.net and contains a collection of topics from the book of Psalms. Click on the image for a larger version, although you still can’t see the smallest words. Some explanations follow.

Word Cloud from the Psalms

The collection of words and their approximate frequency are listed below. This list is not exhaustive or researched in detail, just a quick concordance search on some clearly important or interesting terms. Some closely related terms are combined as noted in the list, including singular/plural and other combinations not all detailed.

The words:

  • God (Lord, thee, thou, you): 1774
  • Me (I,my): 1567
  • Righteousness: 186
  • God’s Law (words, commandments): 171
  • Praise: 154
  • Earth: 141
  • Mercy (lovingkindmess): 124
  • Singing: 110
  • Sin (iniquity, transgression): 106
  • Enemies: 105
  • Wicked: 89
  • Joy: 87
  • Holy: 53
  • Voice: 49
  • Love: 44
  • Pray: 37
  • Cry: 29
  • Strings (harp, psaltery): 27
  • Meditate: 18
  • Worship: 15
  • Clean/Pure: 12
  • Lift up hands: 6
  • Trumpet: 4
  • Percussion (timbral, symbols): 4
  • Clap: 2
  • Dance: 2
  • Woodwinds: 1

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on A Psalms Word Cloud

Books you will not find on a Kindle

This is not a diatribe against e-book readers like the Amazon Kindle. The Kindle is the #1 bestseller on Amazon, for reasons that are not all bad. But technology comes with a downside. The advantages of technology are shouted at you from the package. The bad you may discover only through experience. To bring some balance to our thinking about e-book readers, here is a list of books that will never be on the Kindle.

The Twelve Days of Christmas by Robert Sabuda. This pop-up book contains some of the best and most artistic paper engineering around.

The Sea by Philip Plisson. This 11×14 coffee table photography book has fold-out panoramas that are 44 x14 inches.

Penguin (Zooflipz) by Jody-Grant Gray. Flip the pages for a “you control the speed” animation.

Animals (Baby Touch and Feel) by DK Publishing has fur that you can touch.

Mark Twain: Five Novels, the leather bound edition by Canterbury Classics. Twain is on the Kindle but they haven’t released the leather-bound edition yet.

Voyage of the Dawn Treader first edition, autographed by C.S. Lewis. This would only cost you $100 unsigned, but with the autograph it is worth perhaps $20,000. You can’t get the Kindle version autographed at any price.

You may say that we can release an e-book version of any of these. Readers can do animations, readers can project on a large screen, autographs can be scanned. The fur is a little harder to simulate. Doing any of the above would merely prove the point. None of them are the real thing.

These are special cases, to be sure, but important ones. Our world narrows if we lose the special cases. Your world is narrow indeed if it all has to fit on a six inch screen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Books you will not find on a Kindle

Turning grace into sensuality

Jude said it. Jude who thought his brother Jesus was out of his mind, but apparently had a change of mind and heart after His death and resurrection.

Jude wanted to talk about the gospel, “our common salvation” (v. 3). It’s all about the gospel, right? But no, sometimes it is necessary to defend the gospel, to “contend for the faith.”

Why does the gospel need defended? Because there are these people (v. 4). People “in” the church. but they don’t really belong there. They are described as ungodly. They have this startling, very un-godlike characteristic: they “turn the grace of our God into licentiousness [sensuality].” We expect the world to be confused about this, to promote sensuality. How can someone do this in the name of God? How can a minster of the grace of God be confused about this?

I don’t know how it happens, but it does happen today. I mean literally today, when I tuned into an online service at a contemporary church. An announcement about the current sermon series used as a background the country song “She’s Country” by Jason Aldean. Curious, I looked up the lyrics. Here a few excerpts: “sexy swinging’ walk… a hell raisin’ sugar when the sun goes down, mama taught her how to rip up a town… crazy mother trucker, undercover lover.” Any hints of sensuality there? Anything seem out of place at church?

Not out of place at this church. A fan of the church told me recently, “some of the most godly people I know listen to Lady Gaga.” Lady Gaga? Bisexual, erotic, poster child for sensuality Gaga? With her recent release of “Judas” you can add blasphemy to the list as well. If you want a pop icon to illustrate “not like God,” she would be it.

And grace teaches us that we have the liberty to listen to her? No, grace teaches us to deny ungodly lusts. Grace teaches us to live soberly, righteously, and godly. (Titus 2:11-12). To be blunt, grace and Gaga are opposites. If you make yourself a friend of the world, you will find yourself an enemy of God. That’s James, Jude’s brother, writing in James 4:4.

The pastor at this church said, “teach your young people to love Jesus and they will stay pure.” Teach your young people to love Lady Gaga and they won’t, I contend. Try to teach them both, and Jude says you need to be contended with. Our very faith is at stake.

They didn’t have Facebook in Jude’s day, but “I love Jesus” and “I love Gaga” on someone’s wall seems very much what Jude had in mind when he spoke of turning the grace of our God into sensuality. Do that, and you will find Jude contending with you. And James. And everyone that truly understands and loves the gospel.

This is my personal application and illustration of Mark Minnick’s three-part series on Jude 1:3-4.

Posted in Christian Life | Comments Off on Turning grace into sensuality

Thinking Inside the Box

Here’s an old riddle I heard at a party recently:

“A family of four needs to cross a bridge. Only one or two can cross at a time. They must share one flashlight which must be brought back after each trip. Father takes 10 minutes. Mother takes 5 minutes. Sister takes 2 minutes. Brother takes 1 minute. They must get across in 17 minutes total. What order should they go in?”

It sounds impossible – the intuitive “best solution” takes 19 minutes (Brother escorts each of them across and then returns for the others, 10+1+5+1+2 = 19).

I spent 30 minutes trying to discover “out of the box” solutions. Dad carries Sister? They find a boat? Toss the flashlight back across the bridge? I was assured no such tricks were necessary. Finally I set out to prove the problem impossible, as follows: Five trips are necessary. A trip with Dad takes 10 and a trip with Mom takes 5, for a total of 15, leaving only 2 minutes remaining to make three trips. Impossible, right? Yes, if Dad and Mom go separately. So if there is a possible solution, it must involve…

That line of thinking led me to the simple “in the box” solution (which you are welcome to email me for if you can’t figure it out). And I realized there is a lesson here. It has become fashionable to think “outside the box,” as if that is a virtue and and the best answers are always “out there.” Maybe sometimes they are. But other times the best answer is right here inside of the box, over in a corner you neglected to check out.

This is a lesson for engineering design, where the search for clever solutions can cause us to overlook some mundane but highly effective solutions. Life is that way too, sometimes. We want a clever diet rather than a simple admonition to “eat less and exercise more.” We want a prescription for Christian growth more exotic than “read your Bible, pray every day.” Maybe, just maybe, the solution is inside the box after all.

Posted in Christian Life, Engineering | Comments Off on Thinking Inside the Box

More watts than a blue whale

Jonah Lehrer is a contributing editor at Wired and an author of several books. I don’t know much about him, but he is keynote speaker at a conference I am considering attending, so I started poking around. I found this fascinating article of his in the New York Times, A Physicist Solves the City. It is hard to summarize concisely, but this sentence got my attention and might interest you in reading it: “And what you find is that we have created a lifestyle where we need more watts than a blue whale.”

Posted in Science and Technology | Comments Off on More watts than a blue whale

In the beginning

I started blogging years ago and shut it down because of spam. Now I am older and maybe wiser and needing to explain technology to other people, so I am starting it back up again. Not sure about the wiser part, though. I know more but I’m not sure I understand more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on In the beginning